Mank is a documentary about the legendary film director and cinematographer, Josef von Sternberg. The film features footage of Mank’s own movie sets and some of the locations he designed, as well as interviews with some of his friends, family, and colleagues.
The film is a little hard to watch for the first ten minutes or so as it gives a little of an overview of his life and work. Then it switches to a more personal documentary interview with von Sternberg as he discusses his work, his life, and his personal life. The movie is also a little dark at times for its lack of light, as the interviews are told through a voice over narration. It’s a little unsettling in places, but well worth a look.
The movie doesn’t have much to do with the story of the man, but it does have some interesting interviews. In it, von Sternberg talks about his work and his life. Also, he talks about his personal life and how it’s affected his work. It’s a little too light for my tastes, but it’s a good watch.
The movie actually has a strong storyline (and does a good job of it), but there’s little else to it. Its a little too light and light-hearted for me, which is a shame, because mank is an interesting, if not a little creepy concept. If you loved the movie, you should definitely check it out.
Well I don’t think you can really call it creepy, but I do sort of like the idea of a movie that has a storyline and a good story and is just kind of a random movie about a guy named mank who happens to be a really good guy who tries to make the world a better place.
In the end, Mank was a movie about a guy named Mank who happened to be a really good guy. The idea of good guys all doing good things is a recurring theme in sci-fi and fantasy movies, but most of them are just too dumb to succeed, which is why Mank was so good.
The story of Mank is actually pretty great. It has a good story, lots of character development, and a really good central character. It’s just unfortunate that he’s the only good guy in the movie. His character was basically just Mank’s name, and the plot is all about him trying to do all the right things.
The story of Mank is pretty good, but it’s one of those stories where the good guy is about as likely to succeed as a bad guy. Manks is just a dumbass.
The movie, though, is about Manks journey to figure out who he is, and if he can be like everyone else. The problem with that is that the only other good guy in the movie is the villain. Manks is a good guy, but only after he has decided to go after the bad guys and try to be a hero, which is what leads him to failure.
The movie is quite good. The problem is that it has a lot of a “guy gets what he wants/goes after bad guys” type story. But that was what I expected from a story about a guy who has to fight to be a hero. The movie is a good movie, but it’s also a movie about a guy who fights to have a good relationship with his mother and his friends.